TrustEDD METHODOLOGY

In our research we carry out both qualitative and quantitative text-based analyses on self-compiled corpora.
For the TrustEDD project we aim to enlarge our current database and corpus,  which comprise various scientific dissemination practices in digital platforms.

We rely on the qualitative and quantitative software NVivo for mixed-method approaches. We also make use of corpus concordance programmes to complement our quantitative analyses, such as AntConc and #LancsBox.
To gather data from the project participants, we make use of ethnomethodological tools such as questionnaires and semi-structured interviews.

InterGedi is committed to making an ethical and responsible use of digital data, for which we have developed a comprehensive policy that you can read here, regarding how experts construct their texts and make use of specific mechanisms.

TrustEDD Database

This database is a living organism that we constantly feed with new digital practices for scientific dissemination and new textual sources of information.

Our objects of study at the moment comprise:

Web-hosted practices

  • Feature articles
  • Research digests
  • Ask an Expert sites
  • Explainers
  • Knowledge-dissemination platforms
    (e.g.,
    TheConversation, The Science Matters, Social Media Centre)
  • Scientific texts for adolescents
  • Podcasts 

Social media practices

  • X/Twitter posts
  • Instagram posts
  • LinkedIn posts

 

TrustEDD Corpus (Core)

The corpus already includes 30 texts for most of the digital practices covered in the TrustEDD Database. In this project, we have extended the range of digital practices (web-hosted and social media) under study, and we are currently completing this core corpus. 

Several criteria were agreed for the compilation of the corpus. Drawing on the relevance of the Sustainable Development Goals, we have established a thematic criterion that focuses on four subject areas of societal importance: Health, Economy, Natural Sciences and Arts and Culture. The core corpus, therefore, systematically includes two sites (that is, two different sources of information) for each of the digital practices under scrutiny, and 10 texts per discipline (that is, 5 texts from each of the selected sources ). This balance gives us a solid basis for comparing our analyses, discussing our findings, potentially reaching out to experts and moving forward in multiple directions.

 

TrustEDD Corpus (Peripheral)

We are undertaking analyses that build on exploratory, preliminary and pilot studies of the core corpus and that expand the number of sources and texts for the digital practices included in the TrustEDD Database. This allows us to move in different directions and to achieve a holistic picture of the current ecosystem of digital expert knowledge dissemination in English. By focusing on specific practices, conducting disciplinary analyses across practices and comparing web-hosted and social media practices, among other approaches, we are uncovering trends and patterns of experts' digital practices and online scientific communication.